AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

Progressives Should Enjoy Their Day in the Sun; Liberalism is Already on the Wane

With Al Franken’s slow-motion win in the just-decided Minnesota race, liberalism seems permanently entrenched in Washington. “Progressives” are crowing about a 60-seat Senate majority, combined with an overwhelming majority in the House of Representatives, and the most liberal president in decades. With government-run health care, environmental reform, labor union empowerment and more new spending on the agenda, liberals are calling all the shots.

But while liberals talk as if conservatism is dead, it's becoming clear that the comeback has already begun. All you have to do is look at the polls of upcoming races to see that across America, voters seem inclined to replace liberals with conservatives.

Presidential elections may come just once every four years, but off-year races are always with us. In 2009, there are just two major statewide races to watch: gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia. When Republicans won both these races in 1993, it was a foreshadowing of their sweep in the Congressional and gubernatorial races of 1994. Will Republicans take both statehouses? The early indications are encouraging.

Democrats have a head of steam in Virginia; they've won the last two gubernatorial elections, the last two Senate races, and the 2008 presidential vote. Nevertheless, conservative Bob McDonnnell trails his opponent by just six points. And in New Jersey, liberal incumbent Jon Corzine is deeply unpopular and trails challenger Chris Christie in most polls. Corzine has won consistently in New Jersey, but he is now the clear underdog.

Looking ahead to 2010, conservative candidates seem far stronger than expected, as well. Starting with Senate races, Chris Dodd looks to face the race of his life in Connecticut, as ethics questions seem to have damaged him severely. Despite the state's deep blue tinge, the liberal Dodd seems to have little hope for re-election.

In New York, appointed Senator Kirsten Gillibrand will face a primary challenge from Representative Carolyn Maloney. Maloney has the edge in experience and is closer to the state’s primary voters on the issues. She’s also likely to raise enough money to be competitive. But with a potentially divisive primary, and a deeply unpopular Governor, several more conservative candidates are considering the race: former Governor George Pataki and Representative Peter King. This race is likely to be competitive, at least.

In Pennsylvania, Arlen Specter was expected to cruise to re-election after switching parties. His liberal voting record was said to be perfect for the state. Instead, he faces a serious primary challenge from a more conservative candidate, Congressman Joe Sestak. Former Congressman Pat Toomey has rallied conservatives behind him, and he's likely to focus on raising money and waiting for a battered nominee to emerge. In either case, Toomey will be the more conservative candidate, and he should be a strong contender.

In Colorado, appointed Senator Michael Bennet has stumbled out of the gate; not surprising for an official who has never sought elective office in his life. A survey by Public Policy Polling shows that more voters disapprove of the job he’s doing than approve – a clear sign of trouble ahead. Several conservative challengers have emerged.

Senate races in Illinois and Delaware are likely to be watched especially closely, since those seats were formerly held by the President and Vice President. In Illinois, Congressman Mark Kirk is eyeing the race, and is seen as one of the GOP’s strongest statewide contenders in years. In Delaware, Republican Congressman Mike Castle has a significant lead in polls over Joe Biden’s son, Beau. If either of these challengers prevails, it will represent a stunning shift to the right for either state. The fact that both states seem prepared to reject the liberal legacies of Obama and Biden is shocking.

And if strong challengers in the home states of the President and Vice President suggest concern with the nation’s direction, that message becomes even clearer when you consider the extreme weakness of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Forty-five percent of Nevadans say they will definitely vote to replace him next year. More Nevadans view him unfavorably than favorably, a shock for someone who has consistently been reelected by Nevada voters.

Conservative candidates seem strong in gubernatorial races, as well. In Pennsylvania for example, a Republican candidate is leading in polling for governor for the first time in eleven years. State Attorney General Tom Corbett leads his potential opponent Dan Onorato by a margin of 34%-29%.

In Michigan, several conservatives are running for the chance to replace outgoing Governor Jennifer Granholm. The only liberal candidate who is competitive in polling is Senator Stabenow, and that probably reflects her high name identification more than anything else. Given the state’s deep recession, Michigan voters seem eager for a change of direction. Liberal incumbents are defending the governorships in Tennessee, Kansas, and Oklahoma. In each of these states, conservatives have a better than even chance of winning.

And in New York, Ohio, Colorado, Massachusetts, and Maryland, liberal incumbents face strong headwinds in their reelection bids. David Paterson in New York is unlikely to win re-nomination, which would actually make a liberal win more likely. Ohio Governor Ted Strickland is in a dead heat with challenger John Kasich in the most recent survey. Colorado Governor Bill Ritter trails potential challenger Scott McInnis by 48%-41%, and receives poor grades overall from residents of the state. Deval Patrick too, trails his likely GOP challenger, Christy Mihos, by 41%-40%. In Maryland, Governor O’Malley already has one announced conservative opponent, and could face a challenge from former Governor Bob Ehrlich. O’Malley’s record of tax increases and spending cuts may have left him vulnerable.

So while progressives focus on their victory in the presidential race eight months ago, or plan for the agenda they can implement with the help of 60 Senators, the ground is already shifting under their feet. The electorate is worried about government expansion, repeated statist interventions, tax increases, and inflation. And rather than ratify the turn to the left last year, they seem likely to shift back to the center right at the first opportunity.

Brian Faughnan's Bio
Brian Faughnan is a contributor to RedState.com and the Weekly Standard blog. He has written columns for the D.C. Examiner, and has provided political commentary on National Public Radio, XM, SkyNews, and other media outlets. Mr. Faughnan is a 10-year veteran of Capitol Hill, and has worked as a lobbyist and a consultant. He resides in Virginia.

Comments

Herman wrote re: Progressives Should Enjoy Their Day in the Sun; Liberalism is Already on the Wane
on 07-03-2009 3:46 PM

This short-sighted article, which focuses on transient, insignificant shifts in the contemporary American political scene makes me laugh!!

SINCE THE RENAISSANCE  IT HAS BEEN CONSERVATISM THAT HAS BEEN ON THE WANE.  Think about it:  isn't the world more liberal now than 100 years ago?  What would your conservative predecessors have thought about things  that you now take as given??? Social Security? Depts of Health & Human Services?  Integration? The UN?  Homosexuals in the military?

Similarly, it doesn't take much thought  to reach  the conclusion that the world was  more liberal 100 years ago than 200 years ago, more 200 years ago than 300, etc., etc.

Think about it:  the "Founding Fathers" that you conservatives admire so much were the  liberal radicals of their time!!! The conservatives of the time (i.e., those advocating "no change")  were the Tories, (even today Tory being a synonym for conservative in Britain & Canada).  You see, conservatives, you yourselves have changed over time:  you've moved to the left.

The true heyday for conservatism was the Time of Lords & Serfs, a deeply religious population not prone to rebellion.  Those days are gone forever, conservatives; your god is dying out.

As long as thinking people favor cooperation over competition, altruism over greed, and favor the concept that we're all in this together, conservatism will continue to wane.

Deal with it.

Dennis Robert Antonio wrote re: Progressives Should Enjoy Their Day in the Sun; Liberalism is Already on the Wane
on 07-03-2009 6:32 PM

Response to Herman: You raised some interesting points yet its lacking in substance. In addition, you did not even try to counter any of the author's commentary, in each case he makes reference to the standing of the electoral per State. What you did is you mumble about conservatism and liberalism in general - the world. Herman, we are talking about The United States of America not Europe not every where else, again The United States of America. What you and other liberals out there is that you will debate conservatives far away from the issue being raised or attack the person that is raising the topic based on his character but not the topic itself. Typical of a liberal is it not? If you want to talk about changes then let us point out the recent results in European Parliament election. Do your research if I were you? Or the ousted president of Honduras who wanted to change his country's constitution so he could run for another term defying the military, the court, his party and the people of Honduras? Again, please do your research. Liberals claim to be the group of the most educated and knowledgeable of all beings or also know as elitist but yet in your case Herman you just proved yourself as what we call it in my native tongue 'MAL EDUCADO' which in lay man's term 'poorly educated.' Go back to school and re-educate yourself about what is currently happening around you but don't get your education from someone who've tainted our educational system. Good luck to you!

Fred Coulter wrote re: Progressives Should Enjoy Their Day in the Sun; Liberalism is Already on the Wane
on 07-03-2009 10:00 PM

Isn't the Congressman Mark Kirk, who you think has a good chance running for the Illinois Senate seat the same person who voted for the Cap and Trade Energy Bill?  How is his election a victory for conservatives?  Just because a person is a member of the GOP doesn't make them conservative.

T.J. Brown wrote re: Progressives Should Enjoy Their Day in the Sun; Liberalism is Already on the Wane
on 07-05-2009 10:22 AM

Allow me to answer Fred Coulter's question as a Mark Kirk constituent. Kirk's vote upset me to no end, and it lost him my support for him in the GOP primary. (Expect to see a handful of other candidates go for this seat.) That said, Kirk won re-election in '06 and '08 as his more liberal opponent Dan Seals attempted to paint him as voting with Bush 90 percent of the time. Should Kirk face off against state treasurer, former banker to the mob and Obama hoops buddy Alexei Giannoulias in the 2010 general election and win, it would be no victory for conservatism but it would be a great loss for liberalism.

Fkbfnlzp wrote re: Progressives Should Enjoy Their Day in the Sun; Liberalism is Already on the Wane
on 07-14-2009 3:12 AM

jUlliW