AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

The End of the American Economic Era?

What comes after the United States ceases to be the central point of free-market economic power? We may shortly get the answer to that question. As the United States increases its borrowing for greater government spending, willing buyers of American bonds increasingly grow more scarce, and the “full faith and credit” of the United States will soon lose its cachet as the rock-solid foundation of the international market.

Warning signs abound. Earlier this month, the Treasury discovered that demand had significantly decreased for its long-term bonds. In order to get buyers at its regular auction – the device by which the United States runs on deficit spending – it had to hike the interest rates it pays the bondholders. It signaled a lack of confidence in America's ability to sustain its debt expansion, which has the effect of worsening it through heavier debt service payments on the bonds they managed to sell.

That reinforcing cycle of cascading debt has analysts worried enough to openly discuss downgrading U.S. debt. Financial Times reported this week that Standard and Poor has already done that for Great Britain's foreign debt, issuing a “negative” rating that will require more generous interest terms in order to sell bonds in international markets. The same kind of deficit spending in the United States will eventually trigger a re-evaluation of the U.S. credit, as the United States and United Kingdom face similar debt spirals with no end in sight. John Tyler spells it out:

Under President Barack Obama’s budget plan, the federal debt is exploding. To be precise, it is rising – and will continue to rise – much faster than gross domestic product, a measure of America’s ability to service it. The federal debt was equivalent to 41 per cent of GDP at the end of 2008; the Congressional Budget Office projects it will increase to 82 per cent of GDP in 10 years. With no change in policy, it could hit 100 per cent of GDP in just another five years.

“A government debt burden of that [100 per cent] level, if sustained, would in Standard & Poor’s view be incompatible with a triple A rating,” as the risk rating agency stated last week.

Right now, the United States has responded to a lack of demand for its Treasuries through a questionable and disturbing method: we're buying our own debt. That allows the yields to remain low, but buying our own debt is somewhat akin to creating your own credit card. Eventually, you have to acknowledge that the money you create on the books never really existed, unless the United States plans to simply print money to pay off all the bonds. That would create a level of inflation not seen in the West since the Weimar Republic, and will effectively force the rest of the world to avoid U.S. currency and investments as unsound. It would, for the first time in decades, put the United States on the financial sideline.

What would a world with the United States in the second financial tier of nations mean? We would have significantly less foreign investment, to start, and that has other implications besides just the impact to our economy. We rely on economic engagement with other nations as a not-inconsequential portion of our national security and foreign policies.

If China, for instance, decided to end its reliance on U.S. Treasuries and chose to look inward to Asia, it would remove a big deterrent against hostilities between the two nations. That's not merely theory. The European Union formed originally as a trading commonwealth in part as a means to keep the various nations from invading each other. Countries that trade extensively and invest in each other do not want to lose the fortunes that war would destroy. Our engagement with China gives both nations a healthy investment in peace.

Certainly our military prowess would act as a deterrent, too, but we would have trouble maintaining that with an economy severely damaged by a loss of confidence in our currency and our inability to attract investors. Investment flight would reduce the wealth created in the United States, as would the damage that rampant inflation would cause without an adequate means to pay down the debt. And without wealth creation, the nation would not have the means to maintain its military infrastructure.

Without a strong military presence around the world, which would almost certainly disappear just as Great Britain's did after World War I, the world would be a much different – and more dangerous – place. No nation could guarantee trade security to the extent the American Navy does. Piracy has already become a problem, and without either a massive British or American Navy to suppress it, it would expand enormously. That will aggravate the problems an American return to second-tier status would create in the global economy.

Perhaps another nation could fill the vacuum left by an American collapse, but which nation? What kind of world would global dominance by China, India, or Russia bring, assuming any of these could take that role? How about a coalition of oil producers like OPEC, who have the means to fund it?

Don't look anywhere outside of Asia. The EU doesn't have the military resources to secure its own continent, let alone project economic power around the world. The Southern Hemisphere, save for Australia, comprises nations more accustomed to being client nations and aid recipients rather than generating any kind of economic power of their own – and those nations would lose a powerful source of financial support in an American collapse anyway.

We need to demonstrate responsibility for investors to retain their confidence in the United States as a guarantor of stability, economic and otherwise. The downgrade in the United Kingdom's bond rating is a signal flare to the United States that we will be next – and that our ready source of bondholders will look elsewhere for that stability. Will we wake up before the United States gets sidelined?

Edward Morrissey's Bio
Ed Morrissey writes for Hot Air, where he also has a daily political talk show. Ed has written for the Washington Post, the New York Post, the New York Sun, and has made numerous television and radio appearances. He lives in Minnesota with his wife, son, and two granddaughters.

Comments

Jim Fister wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 10:55 AM

The other day some friends and I were laughing about various visions of Utopia.  If the Deep Greens envision a cow in every little yard, we wondered if they'd ever gotten near a cow.  This vision is a bit more sobering, since it's still a semi-utopian view many have: the US losing dominance in the world.  I'm not laughing at this one.

I also thought of the fact that we feed a large portion of the world through our farming, and also that we as a population give to many charitable causes that provide clean water, clothing, etc.  The loss of that would certainly hurt.

David Obst wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 11:32 AM

This seems like a very dark future for us and the rest of the world.  Can anything change this; at least in direction?  There is the Congressional elections in 2010 and the Presidential in 2012.  I would say if there are not major gains in Republicans (ie. Conservatives) in 2010, it will be almost impossible to unseat an incumbent president.  There must be a point where it is almost impossible to change the direction of this take over.  With the Republican party that we are left with I believe it will be up to the grass roots to take over but do we have the time for that!?.

The only consolation I have is that a year ago nobody would have predicted what is happening today; so I am predicting a conservative takeover starting in 2010 and finishing in 2012.  I have not put a $$ figure on that bet yet.  But seriously, we all have to work for that out come in every way we can.  In use of our time, money and VOTING!

David Obst wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 11:48 AM

I forgot to mention,  GO GET THEM ED !

Always To The Right wrote It’sSscary, If You Try
on 05-28-2009 12:58 PM

AIP column: Imagine there’s no strong America For this week’s AIP column, I allowed my imagination to run after seeing multiple warnings this past week about the credit rating for US Treasuries. The rapid increase in deficit...

Mark Buehner wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 2:16 PM

We need to jam the breaks on spending, instantly. Unfortunately Obama continues to play the game of saying one thing and doing the exact opposite. He admits we are out of money and then he proposes and enacts reams of spending, much of it simply pork he is too afraid to challenge his Congress over.  If I were the Republicans, I would make the argument for a zero growth government unless and until our current obligations (current debt, SS, medicare) have been addressed. Otherwise these entitlements are scheduled to overwhelm us in less than 20 years. Adding MORE entitlements like this ginormous healthcare boondoggle is just out of the question.

James wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 2:26 PM

Hi Ed,

I'm sorry, but this article is over the top.

The Fed is purchasing government debt (and more substantially, housing debt), because the economy is deflating, and the Federal Reserve is attempting to reflate it - or at least have it deflate less.

Some day, purchasing of government debt may cause inflation, at which point the Federal reserve will have to decrease or stop purchasing the debt - which will cause high interest rates.  At that point Obama's deficit will be a real problem.  But we are not there yet.  

There are two points it would be good of you to point out:

1) The Federal Reserve has been buying government debt for 100 years.  Before this economic shock occurred, the Federal Reserve had accumulated nearly $900 billion of that debt.  Of course, it has been buying that debt much faster since the beginning of the crisis in August, but that's related to the crisis, not to Barack Obama or George W.

2) Japan faced a deflationary cycle in the 1990's and purchased government debt (in Yen) at a rate nearly equal to what the Federal Reserve is doing now.  Inflation never occured in Japan - indeed deflation has hardly reversed since then.  If japan is disappearing as a world power, it is doing so for lack of babies, not for lack of monetary discipline.

Lastly, there has been a lot of commentary around the blog world and the news media about the lack of savings by US citizens.   Assuming you won't mind if US citizens save more, that means that their savings accounts (in aggregate) have to increase in size.  How can money be created so that the total amount of money in all the accounts increases?  The treasury doesn't create money, it pulls in money from the citizenry through bond offers at the same rate it over-spends it.  The only way that the savings can be increased is by the Fed printing the money.

James

Wowser wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 3:17 PM

We have essentially ended up in a world where a very few have power to basically do whatever they want with the "markets". They can print their own money. They can save some companies and let others fail. They can save the equity of one company and the bonds of another. They can throw one to the unions. We can buy back our own debt with made up money. We can probably print a federal budget surplus next year. And why not. Just find some warrants for some stock that, low and behold, Paulson negotiated and forgot to tell everyone about. Heck, why not let DELL hit the ATM machine and report double the profits. Citigroup already went from needing a 40% government stake to, cha-ching, profits. In two weeks! What is anyone supposed to believe anymore?

Rex wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 3:25 PM

I'm confused.  We're selling treasuries to raise the money we need to operate.  Where, then, does the money come from to buy the treasuries back?

Bruce wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 3:55 PM

In response to asking about changing it back... I live in Berkeley Ca. and I see this as the Berkeleyization of Washington. In the early 1970s Berkeley was a repbulican town. After the April Coalalition took the city council, it never went back. The rest is history. I pray every day that Berkeley City government has not taken over Washington.....it wil not go back.

Orioni wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 4:39 PM

James, what the Treasury is doing is buying lower interest short-term bonds to pay off the long-term bonds - in effect paying back bonds with bonds.  Thanks to the magic of government accounting this looks like the Fed was going deep but actually it was saving itself money - at least until the short term bonds come due, at which point the Fed remonetorizes the debt (ie., prints money).  As long as GDP grows faster than spending (on average) you can get away with that.  It's like having a chronic cough instead of a terminal case of lung cancer.  

Unfortunately we are rapidly approaching a point where the time-average GDP growth is no longer enough to keep pace with spending and that trick won't work anymore.  Worse, it's quite possible that we could see several years in a row of net GDP loss.  Obama's OMB team predicts that the recession will end this year and GDP will *magically* grow at over 4% in the near future.  CBO is more realistic and assumes a lower GDP growth of around 2.5%.  But if they're wrong - AND THEY PROBABLY ARE - and GDP stagnates at 1% or the recession drags on the Fed can no longer juggle the books; they'll have to raise interest rates to attract buyers and that will lead inevitably to inflation.  Whether it's just 1970s massive inflation or Weimar Republic hyperinflation depends on if Congress can control its spending urges.  If you think the current Congress and Administration will turn into fiscal hawks from 2010 on I want some of what you're smoking.

James wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 4:46 PM

Orioni,

It is theoretically possible that Republicans will be elected in 2010 and become fiscally conservative.  But that isn't really my point, and I'm not predicting it will happen.

My point is this.  Given the current situation, our elected representatives are acting very irresponsibly.  But the Federal Reserve is acting more or less responsibly.  The original post by the author was implying they are both acting badly.  I was trying to make the distinction between the Fed and the Treasury.

James

john brown wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 5:23 PM

I admit that things are looking pretty grim. Still, in the 1960's it looked like America was collapsing, what with riots in the ghettos and campuses and a losing war in vietnam; in the 1970's, when the Soviet Union appeared to be on the rise worldwide, and inflation was running in double digits; in the 1980's, when we were being eclipsed by the Rising Sun. The United States has in the last century seen fascism, nazism and communism rise and fall, and has with each decade come out looking stronger and more durable than ever. Today, I can envision the U.S. becoming a second-rate financial power; but, exactly who would qualify as a first-rate financial power? Japan? Germany? Great Britain? The EU? Even China has problems (especially China, given their 100 million migrant workers and their reliance on the money we owe them). In the long run, a decade or two, we'll be back.

sean wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-28-2009 6:32 PM

The Treasury doesn't as you say, "hike the interest rate it pays" to attract buyers.  The coupon and interest rate on the bonds are set in the WI makret and in the auctions - the tReasury issued the debt, the market decides what the interest rate will be.  Further, how do you reconcile the very large non competetive bids (typically foreign cerntral bank and other real money buyers) and the very high bid to cover ratios at the recent acutions with your contention that demand is decreasing.

The equity market is up close to 30% from the lows so its is very natural to have bond yields move higher as the economy and other asset prices improve.

You also do not understand reserve accounting or how the governemnt "finances" itself in a fiat currency world.  Bonds are a reserve drain, not a means of financing anything.

Roger Godby wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 05-29-2009 12:00 AM

Japan has debt equal to 180% of GDP (varies by website) and a shrinking population that increasingly shuns technical fields at university, yet currently the yen is doing very well against the dollar. While Obamanation still has a ways to play out, I wonder if there's to much hype. It's going to be ugly, but uglier for Japan, even if current exchange rates suggest otherwise.

small dead animals wrote Because Experience Only Counts When You're Vice President
on 05-29-2009 12:39 PM

Who could have seen this coming? For the first time since another Democrat occupied the White House, investors from Beijing to Zurich are challenging a president’s attempts to revive the economy with record deficit spending. Fifteen years after forcing

Olzmjdfy wrote re: The End of the American Economic Era?
on 07-15-2009 8:09 AM

u9MKEM