AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them

The June unemployment numbers came out Thursday and -- good news everybody! -- we've managed to slow the massive economic arterial bleed to a little trickle. The unemployment rate crept up 0.1 percent to 9.5 percent. though, as James Pethokoukis notes, if you take into account all the people who simply stopped looking for work last month, we're looking at a 10 percent rate.

The "glass half-full" folks, are sure to hang their hats on the relatively small rate of increase. The rest of us will note that our unemployment rate is the highest since 1983, when I was a junior in high school, and will be frantically scrabbling around on our hands and knees looking for "green shoots". I'm no economist; in fact, I'm generally lousy at math, but I don't expect that we'll be seeing any real growth in our economy for several months. The pessimist (and news-reader) in me says that we may not start seeing solid signs of recovery for at least a year.

Last week, I wrote about the vital role small businesses play in our economy and how they are the key to any economic recovery. Well, small businesses are hurting right now and our Federal government is inflicting the wounds. Listen to what this New York Times blogger, who also owns a small business, says about what the Stimulus Plan is doing to his company.

Here’s an example: Recently, there have been changes to the Cobra laws that grew out of the stimulus package. The government site that explains the program is 22 pages long, hard to follow, and didn’t answer all of my questions, but it was the best I could find.
As I understand it, there are two basic changes: First, employees who initially turned down Cobra have another chance to say yes (if they became eligible for it after Sept. 8). Second, business owners who have more than 20 employees and offer health insurance are now required to lay out 65 percent of any Cobra payments for employees who qualify for the benefits (this, too, applies to employees who took Cobra after Sept. 8). In addition, employers also must collect the 35 percent that employees still have to pay.
This represents a significant new burden to small businesses. Yes, the government will eventually reimburse employers for these Cobra payments through payroll tax credits. But that can take months.
Let’s think about what’s happening here. There is an assumption that an employee who is laid off is going to need help making those Cobra payments, and that may well be the case. But what about the employer? If a company is laying off people, there’s a pretty good chance it’s losing money. Possibly a lot of money. In some cases, it may be fighting desperately just to stay in business.

In reality, the government is forcing small businesses to float the government a zero-interest loan to cover the insurance payment. The situation gets far, far worse when it comes to unemployment. As those of you who own a business know, when one of your employees files for unemployment, your insurance premiums go up. So what happens to those premiums now that unemployment insurance has been extended an extra 20 weeks? The government isn't picking up that slack. That money is coming straight from the businesses. So, says the blogger, he's far more hesitant to hire new employees, even if he could use a few new bodies, because the cost to hire, retain, and lose them is far too high.

And all that was caused by the Stimulus Plan, which was supposed to create jobs (or save them, har har) and head off a dizzying unemployment rate of 9 percent! Imagine what will happen when nationalized health care and cap-and-trade hit those businesses? CNBC gives a pretty good summary (via Instapundit):

America isn’t hiring precisely because of government policy. Small business owners, who are usually the first into and the first out of the job pool, are standing by the fence and watching. They are paralyzed by regulatory uncertainty. If they hire someone who ends up doing poorly, will they be able to fire that person? Will they have to pay their health care bills after they’ve been terminated? If so, for how long? Who will pay for all these stimulus checks? If it will turn out to be small business, why would they hire instead of keeping costs low to prepare for the big tax bill? Where will the market move? Are you in the right business or are your clients in a politically disfavored industry? . . . Jobs aren’t languishing despite the government’s best efforts. They’re languishing because of them.

So what do we do about the problem? Francis Cianfrocca has some pretty strong medicine, but getting it into our sick economy will require the Obama administration mostly doing the opposite of what it's done thus far.

  • Commit to a zero interest rate policy for at least 2-3 years.
  • Enact a 100% tax holiday on business income and capital gains. That’s not a deferral, it’s a full abatement.
  • Commit credibly to eliminate new regulations on business.

The Stimulus Plan has utterly failed to do what the administration promised and the White House is busy hustling the goalposts all over the field to try to obscure that inconvenient truth. It seems like now would be a pretty good time for conservatives to point out that the President and the Democratic Party have had their chance and they blew it, badly. Now, its our turn to use tried-and-true conservative solutions to get the economy back on track.

 


Comments

MC Hubbard 101 wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 07-05-2009 11:24 PM

The recommended interest rate policy in the post... isn't that basically just advocating a bubble?

Laurence wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 07-05-2009 11:36 PM

Of course, anyone but the idiots running the government would agree about the dampening affects of government regulations. Big business doesn't mind regulations because they can buy loopholes and their effects are hardest on the competition, small business.

I do take exception to one issue raised:

RE:  Commit to a zero interest rate policy for at least 2-3 years.

One of the reasons we got into this problem was due to bubbles fueled by artificial interest rates. The way to get out is to accept some temporary pain and laying the groundwork for a healthy recovery. That will require promoting savings over spending and retiring whatever debt we can. And savings require natural, market based interest rates. When savings is too low, interest rates have to rise to lure savings. When savings rates are adequate to provide the capital necessary for sound economic expansion, than interest will fall.

George B wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 07-06-2009 12:49 AM

Disagree on zero interest rate.  Low interest rate loans encouraged people to buy stuff they couldn't afford and created the demand for mortgage backed securities and other attempts at getting decent rates of return on savings.  Zero interest rate policy would be like drinking to cure a hangover.

Agree on regulatory reform.  Lots of room to simplify regulations to reduce compliance costs for small businesses.  A stimulus that wouldn't pile on extra debt.

Two tax reform ideas:  1) when calculating capital gains tax, allow the cost basis to be adjusted for inflation and 2) reduce the US corporate income tax rate to the EU average around 23%.  Seems to me not taxing inflation price adjustments and a more reasonable corporate tax rate would stimulate long-term investment better than a capital gains tax holiday during a time with not much gain to tax.

DensityDuck wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 07-06-2009 1:33 AM

Ah yes, the old "bought stuff we couldn't afford" meme.  Funny how whenever you ask for examples, people look around evasively and start muttering about houses.

The only thing that we bought that we couldn't afford was property.  And we bought it because, for the most part, the people we PAID TO ADVISE US said "sure, it's cool, you can totally afford it, go ahead!"  The loan agents, the realtors, the bankers who wrote the mortgages; they all said that it was okay.  We GAVE THESE PEOPLE MONEY to advise us, and their advice was criminally bad.

There's quite a bit of blame-the-victim going on whenever people discuss the housing market.  As though the low-means couple (he's a jobbing construction worker, she's a career retail clerk) is going to understand that when the agent says "you can write off the payments and refinance in five years", that agent is talking out of her ass.

Low interest rates have been around for over a decade, and they didn't create the bubble, and it won't matter what we do with interest rates in the future--there'll be another bubble, and it'll be just as devastating.

Three Sources wrote Stomping on the Green Shoots
on 07-06-2009 10:38 AM

An important turn of phrase, from Jimmy Bise: "Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them " In reality, the government is forcing small businesses to float the government a zero-interest loan to cover...

Matt wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 07-06-2009 3:34 PM

Permanently slashing both the capital gains tax and corporate  tax rates to 5% would have an  immediate and and lasting impact. Tens of trillions of $ would be flowing into our economy.

Nepoqxnp wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 07-14-2009 8:05 AM

zv1BaX

buy levitra 20 mg wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 10-26-2009 7:55 AM

polarity vertical restrict bigsens sectortarget machinery johnston ones nellai factsheet troikaa vigor

Xanax buy online wrote re: Maybe We'd See Some "Green Shoots" if the Government Would Stop Stomping on Them
on 10-26-2009 11:29 PM

pharmfree slower simplest mrrj wider determined deficit trivandrum zocor fudk equivalent allotted