AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade

It has to be a little redundant at this point, hammering away at the failure of an environmental/energy policy known as "cap & trade". Many people refer to it as "cap & tax", because it is the largest proposed tax hike in the history of the United States. I call it "cap & trade" because it would cap how much energy we can produce in our economy and trade away jobs to China, India, and Saudi Arabia. "Cap & trade" makes an appearance in this week's House budget perspective, because the bad proposal is moving forward thanks to some political maneuvering in the House. Let's re-examine the cost, specifically the overlooked parts:

The biggest doozy in the CBO analysis was its extraordinary decision to look only at the day-to-day costs of operating a trading program, rather than the wider consequences energy restriction would have on the economy. The CBO acknowledges this in a footnote: "The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap."

The hit to GDP is the real threat in this bill. The whole point of cap and trade is to hike the price of electricity and gas so that Americans will use less. These higher prices will show up not just in electricity bills or at the gas station but in every manufactured good, from food to cars. Consumers will cut back on spending, which in turn will cut back on production, which results in fewer jobs created or higher unemployment. Some companies will instead move their operations overseas, with the same result.

Essentially, we can expect not only higher energy costs from "cap & trade" if it is rammed through the United States Senate by liberals, but we can expect higher costs of almost all consumer goods. Warren Buffett, who endorsed the sitting President, has called "cap & trade" a regressive tax, but you don't hear that bit of economic analysis touted by the main stream media. As the Heritage Foundation has repeatedly pointed out , it will have a few major impacts:

  • It's a Massive Energy Tax
  • It Will Not Make a Substantive Impact on the Environment
  • It Will Kill Jobs

  • Comments

    Howqxznq wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 07-14-2009 7:40 AM

    J7ijIc

    Jana-Roulettes wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 07-31-2009 4:56 PM

    Sometimes it's really that simple, isn't it? I feel a little stupid for not thinking of this myself/earlier, though.

    Best wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 08-17-2009 6:37 PM

    Great idea, but will this work over the long run?

    Roulett Tip wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 08-20-2009 3:57 PM

    I cannot believe this will work!

    Roulette wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 08-20-2009 5:54 PM

    Great idea, but will this work over the long run?

    Roulett Double wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 08-21-2009 10:22 AM

    Hey, ok, I get it, I guess - but does this really work?

    buy levitra 20 mg wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 10-25-2009 7:03 PM

    delineated prosecute wilberforce contempt iuud vials obtained dieu vests unwavering impression midway

    Xanax buy online wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 10-26-2009 11:18 PM

    sounding reader delegations encompassing foreign maxim affair gandhinagar forrh virtually hills analyst

    Ambien buy wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 10-27-2009 3:35 AM

    fourpatient alcohol manifests lunch kadalundi symantec corporates abode quantifier kabi praha

    Valium no rx wrote re: House Budget Perspectives: Cap & Trade
    on 10-27-2009 4:42 AM

    fleshed gambled regain weakest saizen illustrated whisker constraints sikarpur latour parallel