AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

Supreme Court News

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

This past week there were few developments in the Supreme Court nomination process.  The hearings are still set for July 13th, and some Republicans are still requesting that Sotomayor release more information.  However, there were a few minor developments since last week.

 

Perhaps the most important event of the last week for the confirmation process was that Ms. Sotomayor gave supplemental information to the Senate.  Ms. Sotomayor had earlier submitted a lengthy questionnaire as part of a process all nominees to federal judgeships must undergo.  Some thought that the reportedly three hundred page long response didn’t contain enough information.  In response, Sotomayor sent the supplement this week. 

 

In the supplement she spoke about her membership to an all women's group.  According to the Judicial Code of Conduct, Judges should not belong to any organization that restricts membership on the basis sex, race, religion or nationality.  That being the case, the fact that Sotomayor is a member of an organization called Belizean Grove which claims 115 members all of whom are women, has raised some eyebrows.  Sotomayor has claimed that no men have ever asked to join.  Either which way, other judges, including Sandra Day O’Connor, have dodged similar complaints in the past. 

 

Also in the supplement: One of the new speeches provided by Sotomayor, could signal her support for Affirmative Action.  In speech given in the early 1990s, Sotomayor described herself as a “product of Affirmative Action,” as well as strongly implying that she would have not been as successful had it not been for these programs.  Given such statements, it would seem unlikely that she would be a part of the Supreme Court’s current trend of rejecting or restricting such programs.  This fact of course should come as no surprise when considering her stance on the recent Ricci case, which could have implications to Affirmative Action programs.

 

Other speeches were released in her supplement, but generally they seem to only echo the same sort of information that has already come to light.

 

More updates to come.       

.


Filed under:

Comments

Cvybkuvi wrote re: Supreme Court News
on 07-13-2009 8:49 PM

ByEFXv