AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

House Spending Perspectives: Disguising Bailouts

Last week, the House of Representatives passed another bailout of the automobile industry, though they did their best to disguise the bailout as a way to clean up our skies by giving people rebates (to the tune of $4,500) to buy more gas-efficient vehicles. Matt Margolis touched on the program known as "Cash for Clunkers" in a great post about this administration's statist policies when it comes to car manufacturers. How misguided is this bailout in disguise? First off, it may have environmental backlash, as the Heritage Foundation makes clear in a blog post about the proposed program:

Staying on in the issue of environmentalism, the pollution costs of constructing a car could exceed the polluting costs of running a car. One study by “Environment and Forecasting Institute in Heidelberg, Germany, looked at the full impact of a “medium-sized car” driven for 13,000km a year for 10 years. It concluded that the extraction of the raw materials for each car alone produced 25 tonnes of waste and 922m cubic metres of “polluted air”. This compared with 2,040m cubic metres of polluted air for the full life-cycle of the vehicle, meaning that the manufacturing stage was roughly responsible for 45%.” Although refuting studies say the manufacturing is closer to 20 percent of the car’s total emissions, a Carnegie Mellon study found “the manufacturing stage was responsible for 59% of all “toxics” (mercury, etc) released over the car’s full life-cycle.”

"Cash for Clunkers" is being sold as an environmental bill, not a bailout, which is why the hypocrisy behind increasing car manufacturing is important. I doubt many people behind this bill care whether or not the environment gets better or worse; they're just trying to gain "brownie points" with the environmentalist movement while also trying to give out more handouts to Big Auto. Will he bill even accomplish it's real primary objective of helping out American automakers? I agree with Sylvia Cochran when I say, I doubt it:

While it is true that the clunker bill could benefit the American auto industry, it is highly unlikely that consumers will pass up competitively priced foreign models from fiscally stable manufacturers, where they do not have to worry about the American government backing the warranties, and where dealerships will still be in business tomorrow for repair work.


Comments

karenc wrote re: House Spending Perspectives: Disguising Bailouts
on 06-16-2009 12:35 PM

60% of the cars that are currently donated to charity will be eligible for voucher under the cash for clunkers program. Since the tax deduction for donating a car is only $500 or what the car sells for, charities won't be able to compete ans as a result, will lose a significant source of revenue. A better idea is to just go back to allowing the donor to claim the book value for their car donation. This way all vehicles are eligible, the government doesn't have to spend $4 million on vouchers and administer a program with rules which are not enforceable! Since many of the cars that are donated are recycled there is an environmental benefit as well!

Fpkmhgul wrote re: House Spending Perspectives: Disguising Bailouts
on 07-15-2009 10:19 PM

wtwlyk

Xanax buy online wrote re: House Spending Perspectives: Disguising Bailouts
on 10-26-2009 11:44 PM

lutein detract pedigree choroidal tenant atrix imbalances expanding wore henry panels professor