AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

Waxman's Cap-and-Trade Woes Continue; Bill Might Not Have Enough Votes to Pass

Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is having one heck of a hard time moving his climate change bill out of his committee. Three weeks ago, he had to deal with fellow Democrat Collin Peterson (Minn.), chair of the Agriculture Committee, over several provisions in the bill that Peterson felt didn't carve out quite enough room for "agriculture concerns". Peterson was threatening to start a real fight over which committee would have primary jurisdiction over the cap-and-trade bill.

Now, Peterson is saying that he has as many as 45 Democratic votes against Waxman's bill and the more he looks at what's in there, the worse the bill looks to him. Says Peterson, the negotiations haven't really even gotten started yet.

“We’re stuck,” Peterson said regarding a clash he’s had with House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) over a number of issues in the bill. “And there’s a lot of issues that haven’t even come up yet.”

That won't be good news for Speaker Pelosi, who had given a hard deadline of June 19th for all the committee business to be finished. Peterson has dug in and is getting some help from Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), who wants his Ways and Means Committee to get its piece of the pie, too. Rangel seems willing to table the cap-and-trade bill entirely and move on to health care while Peterson's claim today means that the bill could die on the floor of the House if Waxman continues to take a unilateral approach to getting it there.

Of course, this is music to the ears of conservatives. A cap-and-trade bill, no matter what it looks like, will be a dagger to the vitals of our economy and a huge tax increase on tens of millions of Americans. Thus far, Republicans have been fairly quite on the Democratic internecine warfare. That is, I think, an incredibly smart move. When -- if -- Waxman, Peterson, and Rangel get themselves sorted out, House Republicans should have spent their time wisely, rallying public opinion against the liberal cap-and-trade ridiculousness.


Comments

Peter wrote re: Waxman's Cap-and-Trade Woes Continue; Bill Might Not Have Enough Votes to Pass
on 06-21-2009 3:30 PM

With the focus on emissions, it's easy to forget all the energy efficiency regulation in the Bill.

A full rundown on why all efficiency regulation is bad, with examples on

performance, construction, appearance,  price, and (lack of) savings effects

relating to buildings, automobiles, electrical products

from http://ceolas.net/#cc2x  onwards

otis floyd wrote re: Waxman's Cap-and-Trade Woes Continue; Bill Might Not Have Enough Votes to Pass
on 06-28-2009 8:16 AM

Why do the liberals feel such a need to further drive lower and middle class citizens into financial ruin. It seems they just do not care at all about us. They say they do, but their actions say the opposite. It seems every bill they pass will hurt the people who elected them and they proceed just like we do not matter. Each bill they pass makes the American dream of sucess a little further away.I do not think they really care about the citizens,or how their policies will hurt  Americans. Personally, I can not afford higher utility bills or higher taxes, no one can, but as is becoming the norm, its open wide America, and swallow this pill, it will make your polititions look better in the morning.

Cwfnbyov wrote re: Waxman's Cap-and-Trade Woes Continue; Bill Might Not Have Enough Votes to Pass
on 07-15-2009 2:39 PM

SqRnET