AMERICAN ISSUES PROJECT

Moderation and Identity Politics...together?

Today I would normally write about health care, but given Obama's announcement this morning, I will share some thoughts on the Supreme Court. 

A few weeks ago when the speculative short lists started to emerge the various interest groups of the Democrat Party started to clamor.  The two loudest groups asking for recognition were of course Hispanics and women.  It soon became taken for granted by most pundits that Obama had to choose a woman.  There were also some prominent last minute charges by folks wishing for a Hispanic judge.  Here in Colorado, the governor and both senators sent a letter to the President requesting he nominate former senator and current Secretary of the Interior, (Hispanic) Ken Salazar.  One can debate the merits of Mr. Salazar, but given his little judicial experience, even my home town newspaper implied that the letter was meant as little more than a gesture to placate the state's Hispanic population.  During all of this hullabaloo, I remember thinking, "Obama will probably pick Sotomayor ,thus killing two birds with one stone."  And I was so proud of the President when he said over the weekend that he didn't feel bound by demographics.  Raise your hand if you believe that now.  Now I'm not saying that Ms. Sotomayor isn't a good judge or qualified or anything like that.  However I am merely saying that the Democrats seem as bound by identity politics as ever and that Ms. Sotomayor probably wouldn't have received the nomination if her name were Steve or Smith. 

There is however a possible ray of light.  Being that Obama seems more bound by the demographics game than anything else, he is less bound by the philosophical pressures of the left.  Of all the names mentioned down the back stretch, Sotomayor seemed more moderate than some of the other potential candidates, especially Granholm.  The fact of the matter is that unless something earth-shattering happens, Sotomayor will be confirmed by the Senate (as surely any Obama nominee would have been) over any objections by the Republicans.  Hopefully, Sotomayor will be more moderate than some of of the candidates Obama could have had confirmed.  Some have echoed this hope by noticed that Sotomayor was nominated to the federal bench by a Republican.  While it is true that she was nominated by the Bush 41 administration in 1992, that nomination may have been the result of a compromise between the New York senators of the day, Daniel Moynihan-D and Alfonse D' Amato-R; Sotomayor being requested by Moynihan.  Look for that tidbit to come up during the confirmation.        

One thing that I have been proud of concerning conservatives, is that for us race doesn't actually matter.  For all the Democrats' quoting of the "I have a dream" speech, for them identity politics still seems to rule the day.  If anyone ever starts to believe the scurrilous charges of racism that conservatives or Republicans have to endure, just ask a group of conservatives what they think of Clarence Thomas.  Mr. Obama said this weekend that demographics are not something to be bound by.  I doubt today really anyone believes he meant it.  But, the country may as well benefit with a more moderate judge, if that's hopefully what Sotomayor actually is.


Filed under:

Comments

buy levitra online wrote re: Moderation and Identity Politics...together?
on 10-26-2009 3:29 AM

singhi byte multilateral abandon gallagher frameworksto retardant eurohistory gwwdjrs equip pmaustralian romanbr